Check out our 2022 telescope buying guide here! Anyway, when purchased my R/C the "original" Celestron unit was not readily available and was offered instead the one sold under the shop's own label (in my case Tecnosky, but I saw the same product offered under TS label). Fastar Technology allows imagers the option of drastically increasing the speed and sensitivity of their Celestron optical tube, allowing bright, detailed images with short exposures. The faster f/ratio allows you to use slower film or shoot in lower light level situations and still properly expose your subject. In these equations: The combined focal length of the objective and focal reducer is given by Equation 1: For example, when d1=0, that is, the focal reducer is at the focal plane of the objective, Fcomb=Fo, so the focal reducer has no effect. Focal reducers (and focal reducer/field flatteners combos) are usually used with two types of telescopes, refractors and compound telescopes such as Schmidt-Cassegrain or Ritchey-Chretien. Based on Test 1 and Test 2, I think there is perhaps more validity to opposing statements here in these forums that the Antares and current China-made Celestron do, indeed, have exactly the same optics just with different housings and branding. But the diameter of the image circle decreases by a factor of 0.63 to about 24mm. I'm going with the Celestron. If a stronger level of focal reduction is used, say 0.5x, then the image circle may be too small to fill the sensor of larger cameras. Normal shipments will resume on Monday, March 6, 2023. nleash the full pointing accuracy of your Celestron computerized telescope with a specialized telescope control software suite. As mentioned in Section 2 of this guide, the reduction factor of a focal reducer depends on its position in the optical path relative to the eyepiece or camera. Today, our world-class team of optical and electronic engineers continues to push the boundaries of technology. I think there may be some confusion here, because Antares makes a variety of reducers for eyepieces and scopes in addition to this SCT R/C but this definitely is a reducer/corrector. There is one difference though the Antares came with only one lens cap whereas the Celestron had a cap for both ends. Celestron Focus Motor for SCT, EdgeHD & 8" RASA, Celestron C6 0.63 reducer/flattener back focus. This focal reducer is made to attach to the rear cell of Schmidt-Cassegrain or Maksutov-Cassegrain telescopes. . Sign up for OPT news, exclusive offers, and updates on the latest gear! CPWI has an extensive object database, employs PointXP mount modeling, and more. Well done. Focal reducers for refractors with focal ratio of f/7 to f/9, roughly, have a design reduction factor of about 0.75x to 0.8x and produce a flat field by correcting for the curvature of the objective lens. Copyright 2021 Stargazers Lounge A few people have reported issues with the male SCT thread diameter on this item being a bit larger than necessary. JavaScript seems to be disabled in your browser. In terms of reduction and correction which are what reducer/correctors are supposed to do both are superb. Dedicated focal reducers for refractors are intended primarily for imaging, not visual observation. However, manufacturers virtually never provide this specification. For Ritchey-Chretien telescopes such as those manufactured by GSO, there are also dedicated focal reducers with a reduction factor of 0.7x to 0.8x. Even though they may have been slightly dimmer, galaxies were a bit easier to tease out of the urban light soup I deal with. Sign up to get exclusive deals, observing tips, and new product announcements. They are reported as identical. An image of about 24mm across, approximately, allows an observer to use a 1.25" eyepiece with a maximal field stop. Once focused it's pretty good. As mentioned in Section 2.3, the reduction factor for these focal reducers can be varied by adding spacers to move the reducer further from the camera sensor or eyepiece. Because most modern Newtonians already have relatively fast focal ratios, these telescopes do not usually use focal reducers. It seems right to put some distance between the camera and the focal reducer, right? Now, Celestron is using that same technology to allow star gazers to connect to the night sky and enhance their experience of the cosmos in fun and unique ways. One of the most important factors in a telescope is its transmissionthe percentage of light that reaches the focal plane. How does it look thats what matters. However I've also read that the back focal distance on the Celestron is 105mm while the Antares is 81mm so they couldn't be identical. 800-483-6287 The most significant mechanical variation, however, is the quality and precision of the threading. External Focusers for Schmidt-Cassegrain Telescopes 3.1 The Basics of SCT Threads I have Hirsch focal reducer, which is yet another clone of the Celestron reducer. The reduction factor MR can also be written in terms of d2 as: When the focal reducer is placed at the working distance, D, that is when d2=D, then the reduction factor MR is equal to the design reduction factor MRD: Equations (6) and (7) imply these important considerations: Most manufacturers do not publish the focal length of their focal reducers, so it is not usually possible to calculate the working distance and design reduction factor. More important, its clear that the Antares is a reducer/corrector, just like the Celestron and not merely a reducer. In this case, an additional T-adapter (with an optical length of 50mm) is needed to get the spacing correct for a DSLR or other camera with a 55mm back focus. These reducers have a back focus (or design working distance) of 80mm. Hmmm . The working distance or required back focus, explained above, is usually specified and is far more important in practice. I really don't see any difference in the current crop except the "Meade" is usually the cheapest. Since the focal plane of an eyepiece is rarely precisely known(except for some brands such as Baader Planetarium and Tele Vue), and because the nosepiece of an eyepiece is of a fixed length, the actual reduction factor will be close to, but not exactly at, its designed reduction factor. However, some focal reducers can be used over a wider range of working distances, especially those with simpler optical design, and especially when used with cameras with smaller sensors. Antares Click Lock Visual Back - posted in Cats & Casses: Here is the situation:I bought a Celestron CPC 1100 for visual use.Want to put on the scope simulteanously a6.3 focal reducer, filter wheel, and aneyepiece turret. I focus using a moonlight electronic focuser and focusmax. Obviously bright objects like Jupiter or The Moon show the reflections. Using this same example of an 8" SCT and a 0.63x reducer, a visual observer can also enjoy brighter images and a wider field of view. Since the Celestron and Antares are supposed to have different focal lengths and spacing specs, I expected different results. The most popular accessories for your new telescope! What is likely is that fatigue sets in, and also that as the targets move toward or a way from the meridian there will be changes for that reason alone. This article explains the basics of how focal reducers work with an astronomy telescope. I even lost track of which reducer I was using. No difference. I am a purely visual observer, so will evaluate for visual use only. To calculate how much back focus spacing you need to add, take the thickness of the filter and divide it by 3. A useful thing to know is how far from the objective lens (for a refractor) is the focal reducer located. In this case, d2 = FR/2, which means the back of the focal reducer is located at a distance FR/2 from the camera or eyepiece. InternetSales@optcorp.com, 800-483-6287 This would tell us exactly how well aberrations are corrected. Who cares? Can you help me? And, the reality is that every F/6.3 RC out there Celestron, Hirsch, Astromania, etc., etc. However, the China 6.3 R/C has noticeable internal reflections that I haven't figured out yet. In this configuration, the 29.5mm camera nosepiece and a 6mm extension ring positions the reducer at a working distance of 53.5mm from the camera sensor, which is located 12.5mm inside the front edge of the camera. As one increases, the other decreases. No experience with the Antares reducers, but I haven't personally seen a difference between Celestron and my current pair of made in Japan Meade reducers. (Note: Using the simple equations above, the focal length of this reducer can be estimated to be about 350mm). This is one of our best-selling items, and customers have reported that this product is at least as good as, and probably better than, other leading f/6.3 focal reducers sold on the market for a lot more. InternetSales@optcorp.com. Very helpful, thanks a lot for this article! The Antares FR2-0.7X is the same 4-element f/6.3 lens system used for f/10 Schmidt-Cassegrain telescopes but in a 2" barrel threaded for standard filters. control and Sky Viewer display makes selecting your target easy. This appendix summarizes how this works based on simple equations from the book Telescope Optics by Rutten and van Venrooij. If used before or beyond the working distance, unwanted image distortion may result. 160K views 9 years ago This video is a complete overview of focal reducers and how they function applying to telescopes. This standard distance is a consequence of the design of DSLR cameras for which the distance of the sensor to the outer edge of the flanges is about 45 mm, while the T-ring that attaches to the flange for astrophotography is about 10mm thick. Sign up to receive sale alerts, news about upcoming celestial events, and telescope tips from our experts! My experience is that CN sellers are way above those listing elsewhere. You need to be a member in order to leave a comment. Overall, this reducer does a phenomenal job at preventing gradients due to internal reflections from the camera sensor back to the glass in the reducer, as I suffered with the Antares reducer. Sign up for a new account in our community. Wonder how they would stack up with a Japanese 6.3. We do not price match competitors if they are out of stock. However, I noticed immediately that the Antares had a bit more of an heft to it, giving it a solid feel the Celestron didnt possess. The Antares f6.3 focal reducer screws directly to the visual-back thread of all popular SCTs and converts f10 instruments to f6.3. I have the Antares and am not unhappy with it, but for AP I would want more back focal distance if those numbers are accurate. The working distance of the GSO 0.5x focal reducer with 1.25" barrel and the GSO 0.5x focal reducer with 2" barrel is about 51mm to 53mm, approximately, from the middle of the metal cell that holds the lens. For imagers, the main purpose of a focal reducer is to increase the brightness of the image at the focal plane. Planetarium software package which provides easy-to-understand explanations and impressive visuals of all kinds. They provide 0.75x focal reducers for these telescopes that takes an f/8 instrument down to f/6. Best evidence would by obtained by using a camera and evaluating the image both by eye and with a computer analysis. But in the end they both do pretty much the same thing and it sounds like any performance difference is subtle. Celestron Nexstar+ 127 SLT, several budget plossl eyepieces, Celestron 8-24mm zoom EP and a 12.5mm illuminated double reticle EP, Svbony SV205 camera w/.5 focal reducer, Celestron SkyMaster 20x80 binos on a 40 yr old QuickSet PanHead tripod, Stellarium, Sharpcap and ManyCam on my laptop, SkyView and Nightshift on my phone and a dandy little $9 . It's usually specified from the base of the mounting threads on the reducer's housing, and this is the most practical way of providing this specification. ), ASI Air Plus - Connected items are 'greyed out', Cost of ordering used equipment U.S. - Can can more than double figure, Tuthill Isostatic Mount and Star Trap Power Module. The Antares f/6.3 Focal Reducer for Schmidt-Cassegrain Telescopes is a low-price option for reducing the focal length of your Schmidt-Cassegrain telescope from f/10 to f/6.3. Sky recognition technology that has revolutionized the manual telescope by eliminating the confusion common among beginners and enhancing the user experience for even seasoned telescope users. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. Thks for that and its not for visual it for astrophotography. 2.2 Using a Focal Reducer at the Working Distance, 2.3 Adjusting the Reduction Factor of a Focal Reducer, 3.3 Focal Reducers for Compound Telescopes, 3.5 Focal Reducers for Ritchey-Chretien and Field Flattened Scopes, 3.6 Focal Reducers in 1.25" and 2" Barrel Formats, 4. As a Barlow's magnification increases with increasing distance from the Barlow, a focal reducer's reduction increases with increasing distance from the reducer. Explore Scientific Keys to the Universe Sale, Antares f/6.3 Focal Reducer for Schmidt-Cassegrain Telescopes, Skip to the beginning of the images gallery. A wider field of view and a lower magnification is also useful, with some focal reducers and with some eyepieces, for visual observers with telescopes with long focal ratios. 3. Please let us know what topics you are interested in. I wish there was. This "speeds up" the optical train by reducing the focal length and magnification of the scope, requiring less time to integrate the same signal. During check-out, you will be presented with several shipping choices and costs. Explicitly designed for Celestron Schmidt-Cassegrain telescopes, this unique lens reduces your telescopes focal length and f/ ratio by 37%, turning your long focal length telescope into a fast, short focal length instrument. Not noticed any optical problems. Add a 0.63x reducer, and the brightness of extended objects increases by (1/0.63)2 = 2.5. As per the OP I still can't see any reason to buy the Celestron for significantly more $$$. Photographically you also get a wider field and much shorter exposures. For visual use, this means you get lower power with the same eyepiece and a wider field of view. If used with other f/ratios, the field flattening characteristic may be unpredictable. They are also less expensive than many external focusers of similar build quality. One problem with getting opinions is that most of use do not have both reducers or have never done a side by side comparison. Again, swapping back and forth for a couple of hours on M44, M35, and several brighter stars, I examined the shape of specific stars near the edge of the field with both correctors. It works fine but you should stick with 1.25 EPs; or can use 2" EPs without corrector. From the SkyProdigy, a telescope so smart it can align itself, to our high-performance EdgeHD optical system, weve revolutionized the hobby of astronomy for beginners and advanced amateurs alike. Scope size might influence choice as well, as a C6 might benefit from the Antares' transparency, while larger scopes might benefit from the Celestron's higher contrast. Reducer Lens .7x - EdgeHD 1100. Focus misses by about 1 turnof the focus knob.Here is my solution:Buy a shorter 1.25 visual back for my scope. Fumbling around in the dark, fine threads might be a problem. Focal reducers for refractors are easy to use. The internal surfaces are blackened and glare-threaded to provide the highest contrast. The resultant reduction factor was measured to be 0.46x. If the focal reducer is to be used for visual observation, the visual back is threaded onto the eyepiece side of the reducer, and then a star diagonal and eyepiece are installed as usual. The nominal design reduction factor of these reducers is typically 0.5x. Rather than a direct side-by-side, I swapped the reducers so that I was using them on the exact same, well-collimated instrument. I would pay slightly more for the Japan produced version, just because Hirsch was not bad either but sold it since I had 2 already. If used before or beyond the working distance, unwanted image distortion may result, especially when using cameras with larger sensors. Reducer Lens .7x - EdgeHD 925 Learn More. In practice, it's important to remember that you will rarely operate at the exact working distance and at the exact reduction factor that is specified. Read our guide! No retailers currently carry this product. Increase that distance, and greater reduction results and visa versa. Sign up for our newsletter to get exclusive deals, observing tips, and new product announcements. I was originally hoping to do this with a made in Japan Celestron, but ended up with a newer China version but thats probably better in the end since it is the version now available, with the Japan ones rarer and only available used. If the reducer is placed elsewhere, at a position called the operating distance, the focal reduction factor will not be as advertised. The distance d2, which measures the position of the new focal plane of the objective from the back of the focal reducer is given by Equation 5: In these equations, d1, d2, and MR are all variables that depend on each other through Equations 2 and 4. Hence, there is a chance that you may not be able to thread your SCT diagonal or other SCT accessory on to this reducer for these or for any other brand. . This means that there must be sufficient travel on the telescope focuser to make up for this. DUE TO EXTREMELY HIGH DEMAND, WE WILL NOT BE TAKING NEW ORDERS UNTIL MONDAY, DECEMBER 14. Regardless, the difference was miniscule and is more than adequate on both and exceeds a 8 or 6 SCTs baffle tube diameter. So, this past week I challenged the Antares and Celestron models to a head-to-hear on my C8 on some decent nights of good seeing and transparency in my Bortle 5-6 urban skies. Stock focusers in an SCT move the mirror of the scope to change the position of the focal plane, and they have sufficient travel to accommodate a focal reducer. Does anyone know if the Antares 4000 focal reducer is as good as the Celestron focal reducer. I've heard and read all kinds of things about the Antares being only a reducer and not a corrector, etc. . Shipping will be via the cheapest shipping method which will vary depending on the items in your order. For the best experience on our site, be sure to turn on Javascript in your browser. In most cases, the easiest option is to choose the focal reducer made specifically for your telescope. Thanks Peter! Nowadays I tend to use the Celestron more with my refractors for imaging and viewing. Using these numbers in equation 4 in the Appendix, below, we can easily calculate that the focal length of this unit is approximately103mm (it will be 103mm plus the small amount by which the rear lens surface of the reducer is recessed beneath the reducer housing). When placed in the focal plane in front of a camera or eyepiece, a focal reducer leads to a wider field of view and a brighter image of extended objects, which is important for reducing the exposure times when imaging faint extended objects like nebulae or galaxies. The equations in the Appendix show how this all works. These 0.63x focal reducers were originally designed to optimize for an image circle to match 36mm x 24mm film or its digital equivalent for astrophotography. Most focal reducers are designed to operate optimally at the working distance in the optical path to achieve their specified reduction factor, which is usually between 0.5x and 0.8x. Reducer Lens .7x - EdgeHD 800 If you place your camera at a different working distance, you will get a different reduction factor and perhaps unwanted distortion in the image. Meade and Celestron both sell such SCT-T adapters with the correct optical length. Yet, the Antares still easily and fully threaded without any hitches. A f/10 focal ratio now achieves a f/6.3, while an f/11 focal ratio now achieves a f/7. Yellow and orange members of open clusters stood out a bit more as the various stars displayed their individuality. There are also third-party vendors such as Hotech. Again, to my surprise, there was absolutely no difference between the Celestron and Antares on any star. When placed in the focal plane in front of a camera or eyepiece, a focal reducer leads to a wider field of view and a brighter image of extended objects, which is important for reducing the exposure times when imaging faint extended objects like nebulae or galaxies. I have a made in Japan 6.3 R/C and a made in China 6.3 R/C. Some coma is visible in the corners, but the image is quite good for EAA applications. This Antares 1.25" 0.5x focal reducer lens (tele-compressor) is used under the Orion brand name to thread into the nosepiece of Orion StarShoot Solar System cameras and StarShoot Deep Space Color Imaging Camera. Celestrons patented StarSense Technology makes it easier than ever to locate objects in the night sky, even if youve never used a telescope before. Most different was that the sky background was a little darker and more uniform, providing a tiny contrast boost for fainter objects. Due to the design, the Reducer/Corrector lens does diminish a small amount of field curvature common to all Schmidt Cassegrain telescopes but does not eliminate it. All rights reserved. which looks like the same one. Using an eyepiece with a 27mm field stop with the reducer will illuminate the edge the same as using an eyepieces with a 42.9mm field stop without it. The telescope side of the barrel is often threaded with an M48 x 0.75 thread for standard 2" astronomy filters. EclipSmart solar products feature Solar Safe filter technology providing the ultimate protection from harmful solar radiation, including both IR and UV light, and filters 99.999% of visible light. I use the Celestron version and it seems OK for both visual and imaging. It's important to match the back focus to within a millimeter or two to get an optimal image, especially with cameras with larger sensors. The visual back must be removed first. If I had to guess, the difference is maybe 10-15 grams. If you do so, you will achieve the design reduction factor. The reducer features fully coated optics in an anodized aluminum filter ring with an ergonomic rubber grip. Field stop diameters are one of the specified specs of eyepieces. For example, an 8" SCT without a focal reducer has an illuminated field of 38mm at 50% fall-off. Melotte 15 - First Process in PixInsight (easy! Sign up for our newsletter to get exclusive deals, observing tips, and new product announcements. Torazz Thanks for the extremely valuable article. Upon close inspection, it was clear that the housing of Antares assembled in Canada version was a little more substantial than the Celestron. These reducers can also be used for visual observing with SCT scopes with eyepieces with a field stop as large as 24-27mm. Your mileage may vary. I've looked through one from Meade and first impression was that it was like the Celestron version. CEL-94245. Hi - most interesting - may I ask .. the brighter guys - "if a camera sensor is too small for a n adaper, will a focal reduer allow me to get greater use from the camera? As a consequence, the standard f/6.3 and f/3.3 focal reducers for SCT scopes do not work. Better images are also obtained when using these focal reducers at a reduction factor of 0.5x 0.8x, approximately. Some refractors such the TeleVue Nagler-Petzval (NP), the Takahashi "FSQ", and the William Optics Redcat/WhiteCat 51 have inherently flat fields because of internal optical elements. It threads onto the rear cell of 5" to 16" Celestron and Meade Schmidt-Cassegrain telescopes, making it possible to have a dual focal ratio instrument without sacrificing image quality. ), but stars seemed a bit tighter and their colors were richer and more dramatic. Now It only focuses near things, like some kind of macro zoom. For this test, I used a single configuration R/C, Click-lock, and 1.25 diagonal with the adapter. The threads were similar on the eyepiece end, but a bit smoother. Ive owned Celestron, Meade, and Antares models over the years at least a couple of each. https://www.celestron.com/products/reducer-corrector, //cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/1935/4371/products/94175_reducer_corrector_01.jpg?v=1603736883, //cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/1935/4371/products/94175_reducer_corrector_01_medium.jpg?v=1603736883, Popular Science by Celestron StarSense Explorer DX 5" Smartphone App-Enabled Schmidt Cassegrain Telescope, Advanced VX 8" Schmidt-Cassegrain Telescope, C9.25 Optical Tube Assembly (CGE Dovetail), Advanced VX 6" Schmidt-Cassegrain Telescope, Advanced VX 700 Maksutov Cassegrain Telescope, CGX-L Equatorial 925 Schmidt-Cassegrain Telescope, CPC 1100 GPS (XLT) Computerized Telescope, CGX-L Equatorial 1400 Schmidt-Cassegrain Telescope, CGX-L Equatorial 1100 Schmidt-Cassegrain Telescope, CGX Equatorial 925 Schmidt-Cassegrain Telescope, CGX Equatorial 800 Schmidt-Cassegrain Telescope, CGX Equatorial 1100 Schmidt-Cassegrain Telescope, CGEM II 1100 Schmidt-Cassegrain Telescope, Advanced VX 9.25" Schmidt-Cassegrain Telescope, Advanced VX 11" Schmidt-Cassegrain Telescope, Not compatible with #93648 Off-Axis Guider, not compatible with #93519 2" Mirror Diagonal (discontinued), Currently not compatible due to mechanical interferences. By I have the Japanese version and although I haven't used it in quite awhile, the views through it were superb with no internal reflections at all. Nebula Filters. The price for an item/offer must be listed and valid at the time of match. control and Sky Viewer display makes selecting your target easy. Michael 1 ronin Members This should not be the case if they have their purportedly different focal lengths. So it provides a 0.63x design reduction factor when used with an f/10 SCT at the specified working distance. The lens has a knurled surface, providing a tremendous gripping surface for threading/unthreading. It covers the basic optics and design specifications of a focal reducer, and goes through some practical factors to consider when selecting and using a focal reducer. Brian Ventrudo is a writer, scientist, and astronomy educator. For example, with a 0.8x focal reducer, a telescope with a focal length of 800mm will operate at 800 x 0.8 = 640mm when the reducer is placed at the working distance specified by the manufacturer. Thanks guys, I'm trying to get my ZWO ASI120MC-S to work with my 90mm Meade. Some third-party vendors also make reducers for SCT scopes. This filter threads on to the rear cell of your Celestron or Meade SCT telescope. Both exhibited consistent reduction, identical field flattening, and edge correction properties, and both were high quality optically and mechanically. We only send interesting emails and will never sell your data. Manish holds a Master's degree in Electrical Engineering from Virginia Tech and an MBA from the Kellogg School of Management at Northwestern University. However, some focal reducers can be used on other models of telescopes, but this is not always possible. You attach the focal reducer to the rear port on a SCT and can keep it covered. One focal reducer will not achieve optimum results with all types of telescopes, so there is no universal' focal reducer. However, it will not thread into William Optics accessories, and with GSO it is a hit or miss. For the best experience on our site, be sure to turn on Javascript in your browser. The distances d1 andd2 can also be expressed in terms of the focal length of the focal reducer FR with the lens equation: Using Equation 2, Equation 1 can also be expressed in terms of d2: The focal reduction factor of the focal reducer depends on its focal length and its distance from the focal plane of the objective as shown by Equation 4: Again, for example, when the focal reducer is placed at the original focal plane of the objective, d1=0 and MR=1, which means there is no focal reduction. This telescope control software replaces the hand control and allows the user to remotely control their Celestron computerized telescope from their personal PC or laptop. It must be in stock at the time of Price Match for us to make a guarantee. If you want to use them for visual - try maybe long focal length eyepieces rather than the reducer. I've seen some older threads saying that the Celestron, Meade and Antares FRs are all the same and manufactured in the same factory. Refractors, or SCTs with external focusers, may not have sufficient in-travel to reach focus in some configurations. Wow, that is a very detailed discussion! Practical Considerations of Focal Reducers, 4.2 Back Focus Requirements of Focal Reducers, GSO makes focal reducers for their line of Ritchey-Chretien, Celestron makes a series of focal reducers for the Edge HD line, 0.75x focal reducers for these telescopes, focal reducer for an 8-inch Celestron EdgeHD, A Primer on T-Rings and T-Adapters for Astronomy and Astrophotography, Choosing the Best Telescope for Beginners 2023, Top Night Sky & Astronomy Events in August 2022, Top Night Sky & Astronomy Events in July 2022, Selecting a Baader Planetarium Star Diagonal, A Guide to Choosing Astronomy Eyepieces for Binoviewers, Choosing a Magnifying Finder Scope for Your Telescope, A focal reducer will provide its design reduction factor only when it is placed at the exact working distance from the focal plane of the eyepiece or camera, Reducing the operating distance, that is, moving a focal reducer closer to the eyepiece or camera increases its reduction factor, or conversely reduces the amount of focal reduction.
Pamela Pietri And Bryan Englund, Henry And Charlotte Fanfiction Jealous, How Old Was Lynyrd Skynyrd When He Died, Meat Loaf Cause Of Death Cancer, Articles A
Pamela Pietri And Bryan Englund, Henry And Charlotte Fanfiction Jealous, How Old Was Lynyrd Skynyrd When He Died, Meat Loaf Cause Of Death Cancer, Articles A